The prices in real estate in Crothersville, in the Indiana region have had a strong rise in the last couple of months. The real estate prices for second hand homes have gone through a strong increase in this city.
The price per sq.feet in Crothersville has increased strongly during the last 6 months. In November, the average price per sq.feet was $891. In the following month the price per sq.feet decreased considerably to $329. The price for the following two months in (January, February) had a considerable increment of 508 %. The price per sq.feet has had a considerable increase of 231 % in the last two months compared to the average price for the previous four months. This was obtained by comparing the first four months of the period going from a price per sq.feet of $1,853.25 to $4,276 during March, and April.
Based upon to the price in Crothersville (cities), this has gone up in the last 6 months. The average price during our first sample month during November, is $316,935. During December the price went through a considerable rise reaching $456,483. During the following two months (January, February) the average price fell 87 % with regard to the previous two months. During the last two months, the average price has reduced with regard to the previous ones. To be precise it has gone down 87 %, going from $360,825.75 to $312,911.5 in March and April.
The graph displaying the average price for bedrooms illustrates that those properties with 3 bedrooms are the cheapest ones. At a price of $278,773 they are 40 % more affordable than the average price for Crothersville. Based on the bedrooms values, properties with the highest prices are those with 1 bedroom. They are 123 % more expensive than the average aforementioned.
With regard to the average price per sq.feet , those properties with 2 bedrooms are the cheapest ones at a cost of $110 / sq.feet, with an average $248 / sq.feet price in Crothersville. Properties with the most expensive price based upon to the number of bedrooms / sq.feet are those with 1 bedroom. They are 119 % more costly than the average value aforementioned.